Thursday, November 17, 2005
Sunday, October 16, 2005
Apple update
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Sigmatel
Billy and his friend Gary have written me about Sigmatel (SGTL). To quote SigmaTel.com "SigmaTel offers a wide range of mixed-signal ICs that convert real world analog signals, such as music and voice, to digital signals required by computers for processing and playback." In other words, they make MP3 chips and the like.
Billy writes (edited): How come Sigmatel seems to be making so much money and has such a low stock price? The interesting thing is Portal Player (PLAY) makes the chip inside the iPod, and Sigmatel makes the chip in the iPod shuffle. Portal Player has a much higher PE. Insiders are selling in both companies, but $$ amount for both is not much in either case. Sigmatel is going after the low end market mostly Chinese manufacturers. Next week Sigmatel announces earnings. I expect they will be good. Engineering is done. They are turning the crank now. This isn’t the next Microsoft, but I think the market has more lasting power than conventional wisdom suggests. Very few people saw cellphones as the mass market it has become. 775 Million phones will be built this year. They also make the chips that enable flash memory USB devices as well as AC ’97 codecs. All these are huge volume low margin chips that should be subject to serious competition. As their balance sheet looks good, they probably pay their bills at the FAB.
So what were the earnings? According to earnings.com, Q2 earnings were reported July 26th as $0.30 versus expected $0.31 and last year's $0.24. So up 25% on the year ago, but missed the estimate by a penny.
Gary writes (edited): The market believes the iPod phenomenon is nearing its end so they are cautious of their suppliers like SGTL and PLAY. If the mp3 market is going to replace the portable cassette/cd market, there is plenty of growth left. PLAY is still risky because they are dependant on AAPL. SGTL has a broad customer base.
My thoughts: SGTL is trading today at nearly $20. Book value is $6.34. P/E is 10. My Buffetology calculations show an estimated 5-year rate of return of 16.5%, which is good but not great. It's a solid stock, financially, but I have my doubts about their prospects. What is unique and good about their products? What are the barriers to entry in this market? Do they own significant intellectual property, or is it all standards-based? They hire out the chip fabrication. What's to stop any of the much larger semiconductor companies from muscling in if there are big profits to be made? All in all, the Pokeypine is neutral.
One interesting possibility is to do a spread: buy SGTL (forward P/E 13,35, P/S 2.29) and short PLAY (forward P/E 16.96, P/S 3.35). One should do an equal dollar amount of each. Assuming their prospects are similar, SGTL should rise relative to PLAY. SGTL closed today at $19.76, PLAY at $23.40.
Tuesday, June 21, 2005
Oil that is, black gold, Texas tea.
So, where to invest? Stock market P/E is too high, the yield curve is flattening, Greenspan is raising rates, no obvious tech breakthroughs: it looks bearish. Bonds are risky when interest rates rise, maybe short term and money market are OK, but pay little. Real estate is showing signs of a bubble - half of new Calif. mortgages are no down, variable rate, interest only - a recipe for disaster if the market takes a dip or interest rates rise.
Oil stocks are promising. World oil production seems to have peaked. It's been years since discovery of a major field. OPEC is pumping all it can and still prices are rising. China and India are buying more and more cars, and building more and more roads. How high would gas have to go for Americans to cut back? Are you gonna ride the bus if gasoline hits $3? No? How about $4? Still no? I'm thinking maybe $8 gas would have an impact. What is now a $40 fill-up would become a $120 one. That might give folks pause.
But there's oil stocks and there's oil stocks. We need (non-gov't) ones with reserves, reserves in safe places where they won't be nationalized or taken in war. Let's have a look at some US oil companies.
Company | Reserves | Mkt Cap | $/Bbl | P/E |
---|---|---|---|---|
ExxonMobil (XOM) | 12,623 | $379B | $30 | 14 |
ChevronTex (CVX) | 8,668 | $123B | $14 | 9 |
ConocoPhillip (COP) | 5,137 | $81B | $16 | 9 |
Marathon (MRO) | 720 | $18B | $25 | 14 |
Amerada Hess (AHC) | 782 | $10B | $13 | 12 |
El Paso Energy (EP) | 136 | $7B | $51 | N/A |
Anadarko (APC) | 1,131 | $19B | $17 | 12 |
Devon (DVN) | 636 | $23B | $36 | 11 |
Unocal (UCL) | 681 | $18B | $26 | 13 |
Burlington (BR) | 588 | $21B | $36 | 13 |
Crude oil is currently selling for about $60/barrel, so all these companies are trading well below their oil asset value. These companies have other assets as well, such as natural gas, refining and retail. The four with oil reserves priced in the teens and low P/Es are: CVX, COP, AHC and APC. All operate globally. COP has a stake in LUKOIL, the Russian giant. Prices today: CVX $59, COP $59, AHC $107 and APC $82. I bought some APC and later sold it at a profit. Wish I'd kept it.
Saturday, June 18, 2005
Vic Bremson: Some new investment strategies
Dear family and Friends,
This is the latest in my searching for a good investment strategy in crazy times. I am changing some opinions about things.
I continue to rethink my concerns about the future and still have major misgivings about future interest rates. I am beginning to suspect that we are not having higher interest rates and inflation because there is the possibility that we are about to re-enter into a recession. My theory would go something like the following. I think Microsoft and Boeing will help the Seattle area.
- Companies are not investing money into expansion in the United States or elsewhere. This is keeping pressure off of liquidity issues and are keeping interest rates down. It also means that possibly these companies do not expect the business expansion to continue.
- Older people, are not investing in equities, they are struggling to find interest investments that will give them a living return. This is also keeping the cost down. They have tremendous wealth but don't know where to put it. The younger people are taking the risks. Real Estate still seems safer to people than other equities.
- China and Japan continue to buy US paper and probably have to for some period of time. I think China will sooner or later have some serious problems which will put further recessionary problems on the rest of the world.
- There is a body of opinion that I have been reading that suggests that China is building up a strategic inventory of oil and natural gas, just like us. This is putting at least short turn pressure on oil prices. I suspect that when oil prices begin to fall that natural gases will also fall.
My conclusions still take me to the following directions in my own investment strategies.
- Stay with the big rich global companies that pay decent dividends. I continue to like the American Fund Capital Builder. It is a major piece of my investment strategy. I probably will buy more.
- Stay out of junk bond funds. I believe they will get hurt especially if I am right about recession.
- I continue to believe in health care, some energy-not over loaded and REITs. I think technology companies will not do great in a recession. I plan to look for a good fund that specializes in alternative energy companies as a long term play.
- I would not invest in any emerging fund that has a major play in China. Their banking system is too weak. I think I will slightly increase my position in emerging funds.
- I am moving towards preferring large consumer type companies over value stocks right now. Proctor and Gamble, Colgate, etc. I suspect that entertainment companies will also do fairly well. People won't give up their television.
- All bond funds should be limited to 2 years or less. There is a good investment in US inflation bonds right now that will get you about 4%. A bond ladder makes little sense right now because of the yield curve.
- Stay diversified and alert. Expect a major adjustment in the summer based upon reduced earnings reports.
I know the interest earnings will hurt on the high yield bond funds. I would rather go with REIT preferred that pay decent dividends.
What are your opinions?
DO NOT ACQUIRE ANY CREDIT CARD DEBT. NOT A GOOD TIME FOR THIS.
Victor
Friday, June 10, 2005
General Motors
GM has been in the headlines lately, and not in a good way: announcing losses, credit downgrades and layoffs. A lot of their troubles hve been laid at the door of the United Auto Workers union, but I think this is mistaken. GM has invested much of their research money in pie-in-the-sky hydrogen power, parts division Delphi has had an accounting scandal and GM had to to pay Fiat $2B because of a put option. Much of their new design effort has been in the Cadillac division, and they are much improved but ugly as sin. All of these are management problems.
All the press is bad and everyone is down on the company: a good bullish sign for the contrarian. The valuation is shockingly low: trading well under book value. Their price/sales ratio is an eye-popping 0.09, meaning that the entire company is valued at only nine percent of a year's sales. Market cap is a measly $19B. Investor Kirk Kerkorian has snapped up 7% of the company - and he is usually a savvy investor. So from a value approach, the company is a buy.
To unlock the value, the company needs to be taken over and the current management tossed out. Cars, which have seen little technological change, are starting to evolve in a big way. More and more is computerized. Hyrid power plants and new high-efficiency electric motors may soon mean that the gas engine is just used to charge the batteries.
Here is my modest suggestion: Microsoft should buy a controlling interest in GM. MSFT have $37B in cash. Toss out the old-time management and put in some tech-savvy hotshots. Sure, there is a union contract to renegotiate, but I think that is doable if management gets their act together. GM closed this week at $34.51.
Monday, June 06, 2005
Apple does Intel
Well, well, well - they finally did it - the x86 Mac. The Mac will be powered in future by the same Intel x86 (or AMD) chips that Windows PCs use. Apple CEO Steve Jobs said that their new hardware will not run Windows, and that Mac software will not run on a Dell, but surely some enterprising company will market a product that makes it so.
Apple have famously shot themselves in the foot with CPU choices over the years. First the 6502 chip on the Apple II was on the anemic side. Then the Lisa/Mac went with the 68000 breaking compatibility with Apple IIs. And then on to the PowerPC which is losing the performance race to x86.
I actually think this is a good move for Apple. Their stylish hardware will now be available for the many who would like to run Windows. Their stylish software will now run on computers that are more common than Apples. The Mac has always been a stylish luxury good, this will (IMHO) revive their market share in the computer industry. But I'd wait a quarter to buy - sales will be way off on the lame duck G5 models and the stock price should take a hit as a result.
AAPL closed today at $37.92. I'm suggesting that it will be lower after they report results 13-Oct-05 5:00 PM, and after that it may be a buy.
Monday, January 31, 2005
Victor Bremson: Investment Update
I have written from time to time about my investment strategies for a very tough time. I have been catching up on my reading and analysis lately and this memo is a quick summary of some of things that I am learning. I hope that these comments are helpful to you regardless of the amount that you have to invest. I would love to hear your thoughts.
MAJOR WARNING ABOUT MY COMMENTS. There is no major consensus among writers as to the investment future for the next few years. I tend to be bearish and afraid of the US dollar. One of the prime people that I listen to takes the opposite tack. He says don’t bet against the dollar. When pressed why he says that it is more intuitive than anything else. He says that I am seeing the negatives in my country but not clearly seeing the balancing problems in the other countries such as China. Despite what I am going to say below I still follow his advise on some of my investments.
Here are my general conclusions: (I will partially expand later)
- Be highly diversified. Try not to be invested in US stocks as the center of your strategy. Be active in both international and emerging economies equity and bond markets.
- Stay away from 10 year government bonds , high yield bonds and bond funds that are highly leveraged. The inflation rate is rising faster than the price indices are telling us. Inflation is getting worse, especially for people with lower incomes or fixed pensions. This means interest rates could be going up quicker than we are being told. The fed will continue to raise rates. The only question is how fast.
- Choose old economy stocks that pay reasonable dividends and that have good management. There are good mutual funds that specialize in these holdings.
- Real Estate is usually a good hedge against inflation but there is also great risk here due to the high values in certain cities. I am still invested in Reits but I have begun to reduce my holdings.
- Energy Companies. We are still running out of oil despite the fact that energy stocks have paid good returns the last few years. I have been looking at natural gas trusts in Canada, Oil Companies like BP that are continuing to diversify away from gas and alternative energy companies like Fuel Cell Energy and Gamesa.
- Gold and Commodities. Both of these markets have high valuations right nowbut both will do well against inflation.
Some supporting comments:
INFLATION, US DOLLAR AND STAGLATION
The major inflation index does not include the inflation rate for energy or food. This means that it is tends to follow interest rates and the cost of imported products. Interest rates are artificially low right now because the fed wanted to hype the equity market in order to ensure that our equity markets didn’t collapse after the fall of the high-tech economy and 9/11. They are gradually trying to remove the artificiality from the rates. As far as I can tell the reason that rates have not gone up faster is because of slow job growth and slow employee wage growth in the US. Recent reports have indicated that people are slowly falling below the poverty line because of the lack of jobs and salary growth. The conventional wisdom is that the Bush tax cuts were also needed to keep the equity markets from falling further. There is much argument though about the need to make them permanent.
Low priced imports from China, India and other places has held inflation down and interest rates down. People are tending to be more careful with their money and checking prices very carefully. The problem is that this is leading to a massive trade deficit with China and others. They in turn are investing in our ten year bonds. This is good as long as they don’t stop or try to sell what they have already bought. This would cause disruption in our interest rates and they would go up quickly with inflation. The massive US budget deficits need to be reduced in order to reduce this risk. This is of course very difficult to accomplish.
The 100 pound monkey continues to be what is China going to do with its official currency. It is reportedly 40% undervalued. This means that we are paying 40% less for that item than we should be. This is leading to huge growth in China and ruin for businesses in the US. Consider this last fact when you hear an argument that says inflation is not that bad. No one knows for certain what will happen when China is forced to move to fix its currency. There is some soft evidence to suggest that China is preparing todo something.
The conventional wisdom is that the economy always does better the third year of a president’s term of office. Things are allowed to go down during the early part of the 4 year term so that they can be going up before the elections.
Stagflation is the worse economic result for most people. It means that prices go up and investment values/asset values go down. This might be good for the environment but terrible for those without a good job.
US and INTERNATIONAL EQUITIES—
Value stocks have led the charge in the last few years. Growth stocks and high-tech stocks have not done as well with high-tech being the worst. The conventional wisdom is that US Stocks are still selling at a very high earnings multiple, meaning that they are overvalued. People continue to invest in them because they have been told that equities make the best long-term investment. Warren Buffet buys great companies and never sells. He likes big, well managed, companies who pay good dividends. He buys at good prices.
Value investing is always a good way to invest. However it is getting harder to find good values. Consider investing now in large cap companies with good dividend rates. There are several mutual funds that do this. I like an American Fund product called Capital Income Builder because the fund invests about 40% of its investments in overseas multi-national companies thereby providing some diversification. There have been a rash of large mergers in the news lately. The reason for this is because many companies have huge cash reserves and they are looking to expand through purchase. Microsoft and Intel are too high tech companies with huge reserves. Microsoft recently paid a large special dividend and is actively buying a percentage of their stock back in the open market.
Europe will eventually have some of the same deficit/program deficits that the US is facing.
CASH INVESTMENTS
Cash investing doesn’t exactly mean cash. It doesn’t make sense to get on investment return if its possible. Short-term bond funds for example are a good place to invest excess cash. You will earn a small investment return and have very low risk. In the event that a major market investment opportunity takes place you will be prepared to take advantage of it. For example often there is a opportunity to take advantage of a market sell off. Short-term funds will easy to sell off in order to take advantage of the buying rebound.
Good luck. Let me know if you have any good ideas.
Victor Bremson